kueueleuleu
Run containers sequentially inside Kubernetes Pod
s, Job
s, CronJob
s.
The name kueueleuleu
(\kø lø.lø\
) comes from the French queue leu-leu
, meaning "one after the other" or "in a single file". The initial k
is obviously for kubernetes
.
Motivation
As of now, Kubernetes does not support running containers inside a Pod
sequentially, despite this being a common thing asked by users:
Without an external way to control the containers run order, all containers inside a Pod
start and run at the same time.
Existing known solutions
TL;DR: Convert your containers to init containers OR use external workflow solutions.
Use init containers
Init containers always run sequentially:
If you specify multiple init containers for a Pod, kubelet runs each init container sequentially. Each init container must succeed before the next can run.
Thus, a common workaround to allow running containers sequentially is to convert all containers to init containers, but:
- this requires to change the pod spec ourselves, which is not always possible or might feel "hacky"
- init containers have some restrictions (e.g. does not support probes, handles resource requests/limits differently than regular containers)
There are some solutions to define complex containers workflows (and among them, running containers sequentially):
But, for such a simple use-case (run containers one after the other), they might seem overkill:
- need to install (and maintain) a fully-fledged tool
- need to use specific CRDs (Argo
Workflow
or Tekton Pipeline
)
Kueueleuleu!
Unlike the known solutions mentioned above, this simple library aims to:
- hide the sequential containers orchestration logic from the user
- let users manipulate raw kubernetes objects (
Pod
s, Job
s, CronJob
s), so they can use everything natively supported by Kubernetes (volumes, runtime classes, etc.)
- provide an easy way to convert any of these kubernetes objects to
kueueleuleu
objects
How to use?
This library requires Go >= 1.21.
Using the CLI
go install github.com/norbjd/kueueleuleu/cmd/kueueleuleu@main
# create a simple pod with two containers: by default, both will run at the same time
cat > simplepod.yaml <<'EOF'
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: two-steps-pod
spec:
containers:
- name: step1
image: alpine
command:
- sh
- -c
args:
- echo "start step1" && sleep 5 && echo "end step1"
- name: step2
image: alpine
command:
- sh
- -c
args:
- echo "start step2" && sleep 2 && echo "end step2"
restartPolicy: Never
EOF
# convert this pod to run containers sequentially and apply
# if you like chaining commands, this is similar to: cat simplepod.yaml | ./kueueleuleu -f - | kubectl apply -f -
# if kueueleuleu is not in your PATH, replace with $GOPATH/bin/kueueleuleu (default when running go install)
kueueleuleu -f simplepod.yaml | kubectl apply -f -
Once the pod is finished, check the logs (kubectl logs two-steps-pod --all-containers --timestamps | sort
) to see containers have been executed sequentially (first, step1
, and then step2
):
2023-12-29T13:32:50.488543841Z 2023/12/29 13:32:50 Entrypoint initialization
2023-12-29T13:32:52.139027305Z start step1
2023-12-29T13:32:57.139823758Z end step1
2023-12-29T13:32:57.392700813Z start step2
2023-12-29T13:32:59.393583491Z end step2
[!NOTE]
The first log is related to internal logic: the entrypoint
mentioned is here to order the containers' execution. You can ignore this, unless you are interested in the internals (see "Internals" section).
Without kueueleuleu
(kubectl apply -f simplepod.yaml
), containers logs are intertwined because both containers are running at the same time:
2023-12-29T13:33:43.942542903Z start step1
2023-12-29T13:33:44.848147388Z start step2
2023-12-29T13:33:46.848812173Z end step2
2023-12-29T13:33:48.943165982Z end step1
Conversion also work with Job
s and CronJob
s, and even with YAML files containing multiple resources (see cmd/testdata/*_input.yaml
for examples, and cmd/testdata/*_output.yaml
for results after using kueueleuleu
).
Using the library
First, run go get github.com/norbjd/kueueleuleu@main
to download the dependency.
package main
import (
"context"
"fmt"
"os"
"github.com/norbjd/kueueleuleu"
corev1 "k8s.io/api/core/v1"
metav1 "k8s.io/apimachinery/pkg/apis/meta/v1"
"k8s.io/client-go/kubernetes"
"k8s.io/client-go/tools/clientcmd"
)
func main() {
// original pod: containers will run at the same time
twoStepsPod := corev1.Pod{
ObjectMeta: metav1.ObjectMeta{
Name: "two-steps-pod",
},
Spec: corev1.PodSpec{
Containers: []corev1.Container{
{
Name: "step1",
Image: "alpine",
Command: []string{"sh", "-c"},
Args: []string{`echo "start step1" && sleep 5 && echo "end step1"`},
},
{
Name: "step2",
Image: "alpine",
Command: []string{"sh", "-c"},
Args: []string{`echo "start step2" && sleep 2 && echo "end step2"`},
},
},
RestartPolicy: "Never",
},
}
// convert the pod to run containers sequentially
twoSequentialStepsPod, err := kueueleuleu.ConvertPod(twoStepsPod)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
// create the pod
config, _ := clientcmd.BuildConfigFromFlags("", os.Getenv("KUBECONFIG"))
kubeClient, _ := kubernetes.NewForConfig(config)
createdPod, err := kubeClient.CoreV1().Pods("default").Create(
context.Background(), &twoSequentialStepsPod, metav1.CreateOptions{},
)
if err != nil {
panic(err)
}
fmt.Printf("Created: %s\n", createdPod.Name)
}
The main advantage of kueueleuleu
is that you can continue to manipulate standard kubernetes resources (like Pod
s) in your code. There is only a single helper if you want to know which container inside the pod is really running (as now they are running sequentially):
currentlyRunningContainerName, _ := kueueleuleu.GetRunningContainerName(*createdPod)
fmt.Printf("Running container: %s\n", currentlyRunningContainerName)
As for the CLI, the conversion also work with Job
s and CronJob
s: just use kueueleuleu.ConvertJob
or kueueleuleu.ConvertCronJob
.
Internals
Under the hood, containers sequential orchestration is managed using Tekton entrypoint. I have just "reverse-engineered" the way Tekton generates Pod
s from PipelineRun
. But, unlike Tekton, there is no need to install a separate controller in the cluster or using CRD
s, which makes kueueleuleu
lighter to use. In return, kueueleuleu
cannot be used for complex workflows, and I don't consider supporting these: its only job is to run containers sequentially.
I have used Tekton entrypoint because it is already doing the job, and I didn't want to rewrite another wrapper to do more or less the same thing.
Another solution I have considered had been to convert containers to init containers (see "Use init containers" section above). But, considering init containers limitations, I thought this solution was not viable.
Limitations
Containers passed in objects (Pod
, Job
, CronJob
) MUST have their command
field set. Otherwise, kueueleuleu
will return an error (container does not have a command
). This is because Tekton entrypoint used under the hood requires a command. Tekton Pipelines (who also uses this entrypoint) manages to "guess" the entrypoint if a command is not provided (entrypoint hack
refered here). But, I'd rather not implement this here today as it does not always work (e.g. if image is not pushed into a registry, like in kind
environments, we will fail to guess the entrypoint).