operator-utils

module

v1.4.13 Latest Latest Go to latest Published: Jul 19, 2023 License: Apache-2.0

Details

Valid go.mod file
Redistributable license
Tagged version
Stable version
Learn more about best practices

Repository

github.com/RHsyseng/operator-utils

Links

Open Source Insights

README ¶

operator-utils library

This library layers on top of the Operator SDK, having set of utilities function as a library to easily create Kubernetes operators.

Kubernetes / OpenShift Version Support

In July of 2020, our team moved away from using the term master for our default branch. As a result, our branching scheme is as follows:

The main (default) branch supports OCP 4.13 (K8S 1.26)
For versions of operator-utils targeting any release of OCP (starting with 4.2), please refer to the tags section.
- tag v1.X.Y indicates support for OCP vX.Y
With each General Availability release of OCP a new tag will be created from the v1.X.Y.x branch then the main branch will point to the latest OCP version.

Contributing to the `operator-utils` Project

All bugs, tasks, fixes or enhancements should be tracked as GitHub Issues & Pull Requests.

To contribute features targeting OCP 4.13 only, use a local feature branch based off of & targeting origin/main with any PR's, Reference any JIRA/GitHub issues in PR's where applicable.
To contribute features targeting both currently supported versions, first complete the commit/PR work targeting main. Once that PR is merged to main, create a new PR with cherry-pick of the commit targeting the branch of the specific OCP version that it should be backported to.

Declaring operator-utils dependency

Regardless of dependency framework, we suggest following the best practice of declaring any and all dependencies your project utilizes regardless of target branch, tag, or revision.

With regards to operator-utils, please carefully consider the given version support information above when declaring your dependency, as depending on or defaulting to main branch will likely result in future build complications as our project continues to evolve and cycle minor version support.

Go.mod example specifying REVISION:

github.com/RHsyseng/operator-utils v0.0.0-20200108204558-82090ef57586

Features

managing CR and CRD validation
pods deployment status
resource comparison, adding, updating and deleting
platform detection Kubernetes VS Openshift

Managing CR and CRD validation

Operator util library use package validation for validate the CRD and CR file, these function use as a unit test within operator

CRD validation Usage:


schema := getCompleteSchema(t)
 missingEntries := schema.GetMissingEntries(&sampleApp{})
 for _, missing := range missingEntries {
    if strings.HasPrefix(missing.Path, "/status") {
       //Not using subresources, so status is not expected to appear in CRD
    } else {
       assert.Fail(t, "Discrepancy between CRD and Struct", "Missing or incorrect schema validation at %v, expected type %v", missing.Path, missing.Type)
    }
 }

CR validation Usage:

schema, err := New([]byte(schemaYaml))
 assert.NoError(t, err)

 type myAppSpec struct {
    Number float64 `json:"number,omitempty"`
 }

 type myApp struct {
    Spec myAppSpec `json:"spec,omitempty"`
 }

 cr := myApp{
    Spec: myAppSpec{
       Number: float64(23),
    },
 }
 missingEntries := schema.GetMissingEntries(&cr)
 assert.Len(t, missingEntries, 0, "Expect no missing entries in CRD for this struct: %v", missingEntries)

A full example is provided here

Pods deployment status

showes the status of the deployment on OLM UI in the form of PI chart, as seen in below screenshot

alt text

Usage:

Below seen line required to add into types.go status structure

PodStatus olm.DeploymentStatus `json:"podStatus"`

Add these lines into CSV file inside statusDescriptors section:

statusDescriptors:
        - description: The current pods
          displayName: Pods Status
          path: podStatus
          x-descriptors:
            - "urn:alm:descriptor:com.tectonic.ui:podStatuses"

For DeploymentConfig deployment status:

var dcs []oappsv1.DeploymentConfig

deploymentStatus := olm.GetDeploymentConfigStatus(dcs)
 if !reflect.DeepEqual(instance.Status.Deployments, deploymentStatus) {
    r.reqLogger.Info("Deployment status will be updated")
    instance.Status.Deployments = deploymentStatus
    err = r.client.Status().Update(context.TODO(), instance)
    if err != nil {
       r.reqLogger.Error(err, "Failed to update deployment status")
       return err
    }
 }

For StatefulSet Deployment status:

var status olm.DeploymentStatus
 sfsFound := &appsv1.StatefulSet{}

 err := client.Get(context.TODO(), namespacedName, sfsFound)
 if err == nil {
    status = olm.GetSingleStatefulSetStatus(*sfsFound)
 } else {
    dsFound := &appsv1.DaemonSet{}
    err = client.Get(context.TODO(), namespacedName, dsFound)
    if err == nil {
       status = olm.GetSingleDaemonSetStatus(*dsFound)
    }
 }

Resource comparison (adding, updating and deleting)

Common function for listing, adding, updating, deleting kubernetes objects like seen below:

List of objects that are deployed

reader := read.New(client).WithNamespace(instance.Namespace).WithOwnerObject(instance)
  resourceMap, err := reader.ListAll(
     &corev1.PersistentVolumeClaimList{},
     &corev1.ServiceList{},
     &appsv1.StatefulSetList{},
     &routev1.RouteList{},
  )

Compare what's deployed with what should be deployed

requested := compare.NewMapBuilder().Add(requestedResources...).ResourceMap()
comparator := compare.NewMapComparator()
deltas := comparator.Compare(deployed, requested)

Adding the objects:


added, err := writer.AddResources(delta.Added)

Updating the objects:

updated, err := writer.UpdateResources(deployed[resourceType], delta.Updated)

Removing the objects:

removed, err := writer.RemoveResources(delta.Removed)

A full usage is provided here

Platform detection Kubernetes VS Openshift

To detect platform whether operator is running on kuberenete or openshift or what version of openshift is using

  info, err := pv.GetPlatformInfo(c.discoverer, c.config)